In the history of the business, there are some characters that are more painful than the company's ambitious woman. He was encouraged and pitied and parodied for years. One minute he joined, torn between the needs of babies and bosses. Moreover, he surpassed men in college degrees and determination to put her career first. Despite getting a lot of confidence, educator, and flextime work, though, he was conspicuously absent from the corridors power.Why? Among other things, a Catalyst study of 1,660 MBA graduates found jobs in the world he did not get hot. In fact, men get the project boasts more than twice the budget and three times the staff as a project headed by women. Is not surprising that they also have more face time with people in the C-suite with 35 percent of people say they get high visibility in there while only 26 percent of women said the same. From there, Catalyst said, women tend to profit and loss responsibility, the opportunity to manage people, and a budget of over $ 10 million. So even if they start with the same skills and ambitions as men, women to career stalled by the project less is not even on the radar screen CEO. As Senior Research Director Christine Silva of Catalyst said, "It is not just about leading the project. This is how much the project "To a degree., The November 12 report offers new evidence that women face tough hurdles when it comes to racing. And some organizations lesser tune the glacial pace of progress of the catalyst. For 50 years, the group has studied and advised the company on how to expand opportunities for women. Makes calculation shows that women now hold 3.8 percent of Fortune 500 CEO positions and 4.0 percent of Fortune 1000 CEO position. With these kinds of numbers, you can blame the high Achievers want to escape (bath) fun and just go home but the value of the report lies far the numbers?. It is the sixth emerged from a longitudinal research study of over 4100 MBA graduates started in 2008. The program targets graduates from 26 top business schools around the world, including the Indian Institutes of Management, National University of Singapore Business School, INSEAD Europe, Toronto Rotman School of Management, and a dozen U.S. program of MIT Sloan School at Stanford. (Harvard is not noticeable from the list.) Approximately 30 percent of study respondents were women, almost in line with the percentage of graduates, research and track those who graduated between 1996 and 2007. Objective: to analyze the highly talented employees as they through their careers. If the catalyst can stay in touch with them (always a challenge as people move around), it can be a great resource in understanding not only the pattern of sex but the effects of culture and demographics leaders.Taken separation , leaf number of recent studies not answered any questions. He did not reveal if the woman chose a smaller, lower-profile project for reasons that may range from a family for fear of failure. He did not elaborate on the results by industry or geography, or use different demographics. It would be interesting to know whether graduates in 2007 reported a wide gap in opportunities as those who entered the work force a decade earlier. Some other findings desperately short, like the fact that women enter leadership program earlier in their careers and stay longer, and they get more mentor than men. Is that a good thing? Given the lack of opportunities, most likely catalyst not.What latest poll of the group is not proven fact that no beat work experience. Teaching and lactation large room. But if the leader does not put these high potential women in mission-critical role with a high risk and heavy budget, they are not serious about their commitment. Rather than improving program enlarge the woman, whose intelligent leaders have to see if they will actually offer help stretch his work.